Subject	looking back, after a break, I think I can see more of your
Posted by	robo (sebring1970) on December 28, 2005 at 5:15 AM
	This message has been viewed 25 times.
In Reply To	I still want to know how you can support your argument posted by 300zxquire on December 28, 2005 at 01:59 AM
Message	point. Of course you can believe the ad to be specious and in fact I believe we agree that it is. I think you were just making your "Stealth . . . " comment as your conclusion and not an example of why the ad was specious. Does that sound anywhere close to being correct to you?
Follow Ups	Has anyone here used this on your Z? - Piranha(Omaha) 21:40:16 12/27/05 No. It sounds specious to me. Stealth technology in a can!? (n/m) - 300zxquire 22:41:46 12/27/05 not specious, sounds fake, looks fake, prob is fake (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 23:09:01 12/27/05 Yes "specious". - 300zxquire 23:38:19 12/27/05 nah, I don't need to look it up. Specious means a deceptive - robo (sebring1970) 00:07:05 12/28/05 So let me see if I get this straight. You're telling me - 300zxquire 01:00:37 12/28/05 I don't agree with your supposition that all advertisments - robo (sebring1970) 01:42:40 12/28/05 I still want to know how you can support your argument - 300zxquire 01:59:52 12/28/05 that's not my argument. My point is that if you're going - robo (sebring1970) 04:06:24 12/28/05 You two are making baby Jesus cry. (n/m) - turtleboy 04:35:07 12/28/05 lol, in my case that would be the cosmic muffin (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 05:06:38 12/28/05 Don't cry baby Jesus. We were just playing. We'll play nice! (n/m) - 300zxquire 10:07:06 12/28/05 looking back, after a break, I think I can see more of your - robo (sebring1970) 05:15:57 12/28/05 Bingo! Somebody finally understands me! sniff, sniff.. 8^) (n/m) - 300zxquire 10:03:55 12/28/05 This semantic melodrama brought to you by Coke, Laserveil, - Technomancer 10:36:35 12/28/05 lol. Good one! Have a Coke and a smile and STFU. Perfect! (n/m) - 300zxquire 10:55:59 12/28/05 and yet, here you are (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 15:09:54 12/28/05 nope...just by a valentine one or passport x50-thats - sethkins88 22:43:23 12/27/05 Radartest.com doesn't speak that highly of it - FastFrankie 22:49:58 12/27/05 Passport is useless against laser unless you can - Piranha(Omaha) 23:39:32 12/27/05 Passport is not an effective defense against laser, true - FastFrankie 01:39:23 12/28/05 I wouldn't put this stuff on my headlights, it darkens the - WildBillZx 00:28:15 12/28/05 the only thing that can possibly absorb radar is the - E=mz² 07:43:21 12/28/05 Veilside (n/m) - zboost(tx) 08:17:51 12/28/05 aaaaaaahahahahah... - Zfreak(Dallas) 15:41:41 12/28/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.